Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micronutrient and microbial inoculant treatments over NPK increased effective tillers by 25% to 38% compared with the control.

A claim from Studies on the rhizosphere, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) influenced by micronutrients, FYM and biofertilizers · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient and microbial inoculant treatments over NPK increased effective tillers by 25% to 38% compared with the control.

Treatment
superimposition of micro nutrients and microbial inoculants over NPK dosese1
Outcome
effective tillerse1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
25% to 38%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–63
e1

“The superimposition of micro nutrients and microbial inoculants over NPK doses in different treatments exhibited significant response in terms of increasing root length (25% to 40%), root fresh weight (21% to 34%), effective tillers (25% to 38%), ear length (9% to 20%), grains ear-1 (15% to 36%) grain yield (26% to 34%) compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1225

Title

Studies on the rhizosphere, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) influenced by micronutrients, FYM and biofertilizers

VK Verma; Ram Pyare; Dhananjai Singh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-3f50d4deea02cbae8f585cc60c9636336de056706df8fc40765ffb0842a396b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.