Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Superimposition effect of micronutrients, organic manure and microbial inoculants over NPK does on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

VK Verma; Ram Pyare; Ashutosh Pandey; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted during the Rabi seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 at Students Instructional Farm of C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur with the objective to find out suitable superimposed nutritional doses to improve production, productivity and economics of wheat under irrigated conditions. The treatments consisted of superimposed does of Sulphur (25.0 kg.ha), Zinc (2.0 kg/ha), Boron (1.0 kg/ha), Iron (5.0 kg/ha), FYM (5 t/ha), Azotobacter and PSB as individually and in combination along with NPK doses compared with only NPK doses (control treatment), were laid out in Randomized Block Design and replicated three times. The response of above fertility levels was analyzed on growth parameters, yield attributes and yield as well as economics of normal sown wheat variety Mahi (K-402). The superimposition of micro nutrients and microbial inoculants over NPK doses in different treatments exhibited significant response in terms of increasing grain yield from 11.94 to 26.10% compared to control treatment. The combined doses of NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe recorded highest grain yield (47.50q/ha and 53.05 q/ha), gross income (Rs. 90325/ha and Rs. 103734/ha) and Net income (Rs. 46866/ha and Rs. 58088/ha) during 2014-15 and 2015-16, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient and microbial additions increased wheat grain yield 11.94 to 26.10% over NPK control.

Treatment
superimposition of micro nutrients and microbial inoculants over NPK dosese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11.94 to 26.10%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The superimposition of micro nutrients and microbial inoculants over NPK doses in different treatments exhibited significant response in terms of increasing grain yield from 11.94 to 26.10% compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe gave the highest grain yield in both seasons.

Treatment
NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.50q/ha and 53.05 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined doses of NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe recorded highest grain yield (47.50q/ha and 53.05 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe gave the highest gross income in both seasons.

Treatment
NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fee0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 90325/ha and Rs. 103734/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined doses of NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe recorded highest grain yield (47.50q/ha and 53.05 q/ha), gross income (Rs. 90325/ha and Rs. 103734/ha) and Net income (Rs. 46866/ha and Rs. 58088/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe gave the highest net income in both seasons.

Treatment
NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fee0
Outcome
Net incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 46866/ha and Rs. 58088/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined doses of NPK+FYM+S+Zn+B+Fe recorded highest grain yield (47.50q/ha and 53.05 q/ha), gross income (Rs. 90325/ha and Rs. 103734/ha) and Net income (Rs. 46866/ha and Rs. 58088/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1240 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.