Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gly + imazaquin had no effect on crabgrass control in soybean.

A claim from A Multy-Year Study Reveals the Importance of Residual Herbicides on Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gly + imazaquin had no effect on crabgrass control in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
Brasmax Apollo RRe2
Treatment
gly + imazaquine4
Interactor
crabgrasse4weed
Outcome
crabgrass controle4
Direction
no effecte4
Setting
field studye0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field study was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–44
e2

“soybean cultivar Brasmax Apollo RR was planted under residues of rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–304
e4

“The mix containing gly + metribuzin, gly + 2.4-D amine, gly + imazaquin and gly applied alone had no effect in the crabgrass control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1074

Title

A Multy-Year Study Reveals the Importance of Residual Herbicides on Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

A.L. NUNES; J. LORENSET; J.E. GUBIANI; et al. Planta Daninha 2018. doi:10.1590/s0100-83582018360100039

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-3f9c28b71ac383df63b842e3ab43daa0f478084a70f6c7e8517ed553bb50a296 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

imazaquin · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.