Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T14 was significantly superior for guava growth characteristics.

A claim from Effect of organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizers on growth parameters of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar in Mrig Bahar crop of sub humid agro ecological zone of Rajasthan · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T14 was significantly superior for guava growth characteristics.

Material
Sardart0
Treatment
T14 (75% RDF + 10 kg Vermicompost + 50 g Azotobacter + 50 g PSB + 5 kg mustard oil cake per plant)e0
Outcome
plant growth characteristicse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T14 (75% RDF + 10 kg Vermicompost + 50 g Azotobacter + 50 g PSB + 5 kg mustard oil cake per plant) was found significantly superior over all other treatments with respect to plant growth characteristics including soil physicochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–815
t0

“Guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–129

Title

Effect of organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizers on growth parameters of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Sardar in Mrig Bahar crop of sub humid agro ecological zone of Rajasthan

Ramawatar .; MC Jain; Prerak Bhatnagar; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4ad.10027

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-3fa935f1e1e2e07a1368aa81ed2c1489ecc6780f13b3892b3a4d2eb9969a5d7e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 56 positive, 3 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.