Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined FYM and jeevamrit application gave maximum speed of germination in garden pea.

A claim from Influence of organic nutrient sources on growth and seed quality of garden pea · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FYM and jeevamrit application gave maximum speed of germination in garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust1
Treatment
Combined application of FYM @ 15 t ha-1 and jeevamrit @ 10% drenchinge0
Outcome
speed of germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.68 dayse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78
e0

“Combined application of FYM @ 15 t ha-1 and jeevamrit @ 10% drenching resulted in maximum plant height (80.63 cm), pod length (8.84 cm), number of pods per plant (21.33), number of seeds per pod (8.07), gross seed yield (12.56 q ha-1), graded seed yield (11.31 q ha-1), speed of germination (8.68 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1082

Title

Influence of organic nutrient sources on growth and seed quality of garden pea

Nitin Yadav; K. S. Thakur; R. K. Bhardwaj; et al. Vegetable Science 2023. doi:10.61180/vegsci.2023.v50.i2.07

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-40aa0fbd4e5c4ba44d60adb4f7681153bb515f4c003c0284ed4eee70b9522cfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soaking pea seeds in imazethapyr did not affect germination, emergence, or growth.

    Broomrape (Orobanche crenata) Control with Imazethapyr Applied to Pea (Pisum sativum) Seed · 1996

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Seed soaking with inhibitor reduced shoot elongation in all four pea varieties by at least 50%.

    Inhibition of the Growth of Peas by Tris-(2-Diethylaminoethyl)-Phosphate Trihydrochloride · 1966

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Water soaking decreased development of leaves, stipules, petioles and tendrils.

    Transplantation Experiments in Peas. III · 1943

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    The seed soak did not seriously impair pea germination.

    ANTIBIOTIC XG AS A SEED TREATMENT FOR THE CONTROL OF LEAF AND POD SPOT OF PEAS CAUSED BY ASCOCHYTA PISI · 1950 · compared with diseased pea seed samples

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Foliar zinc did not affect plant height or stem diameter in either year.

    The Effects of Foliar Zinc Application on Yield and Quality Components of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Mediterranean Climate Conditions · 2022

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Implanted pea seeds had lower germination percentage.

    The growth effect by N~(+) using a plasma immersion ion implanter of pea seed implanted · 2000

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Higher acid concentration and longer soaking reduced germination rate.

    Effects of salicylic acid on germination of pea seed · 2005

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Soaking for 10–24 hours had no significant effect on pea sprout germination.

    Effects of Different Treatments on Yield and Quality of Pea(Pisum sativum Linn. ) Sprouts · 2012

    Opposite direction

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    T4 had the fewest days to germination (10.63 days).

    Impact of Integrated Use of Inorganic, Organic and Biofertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) · 2023

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Fertilizer N below 40 kg N ha -1 had no significant effect on biomass N at flatpod.

    Inoculant formulation and fertilizer nitrogen effects on field pea: Nodulation, N2 fixation and nitrogen partitioning · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Spent mushroom compost produced poor seed germination.

    Organic waste compost and spent mushroom compost as potential growing media components for the sustainable production of microgreens · 2023

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    NaCl reduced pea growth under semi-controlled conditions.

    Growth, ion composition, and stomatal conductance of peas exposed to salinity · 2010

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Side-banded phosphorus fertilizer reduced seedling emergence at three weeks.

    Field pea response to seeding depth and P fertilization · 2001

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Pea, faba bean, lentil and chickpea were the least responsive to starter fertilizer in 30-day biomass, with no benefit above 10 kg N per ha.

    Effect of starter fertilizer in seed-row on emergence, biomass and nutrient uptake by six pulse crops grown under controlled environment conditions · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Some pea varieties maintained similar biomass with and without phosphorus fertilizer.

    Harnessing Phosphorous (P) Fertilizer-Insensitive Bacteria to Enhance Rhizosphere P Bioavailability in Legumes · 2024 · compared with without P fertilization

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Increasing nitrogen doses did not significantly increase vegetative biomass in all cases.

    Interaction between Nutrition and Herbicide Application in Pea Culture · 2009

    Opposite direction

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.