Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage raised maize grain yield 15.5% relative to rotavator.

A claim from Tillage and nutrient-management practices for improving productivity and soil physico-chemical properties in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions in Kandi region of Punjab · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised maize grain yield 15.5% relative to rotavator.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.5e0
Comparator
rotavatore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage resulted in 15.5 and 0.44 % higher grain yield of maize and wheat (3.10 and 2.26 t/ha respectively) over rotavator (2.62 and 2.25 t/ha respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–975

Title

Tillage and nutrient-management practices for improving productivity and soil physico-chemical properties in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions in Kandi region of Punjab

A.K. KHOKHAR; S.S. BAWA; SATVINDER SINGH; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v63i3.5648

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-40b0b89ef7bd3161e5970b20d867927cf0a303a89041943e33d1c94cb269bc91 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.