Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage raised wheat grain yield 0.44% relative to rotavator.

A claim from Tillage and nutrient-management practices for improving productivity and soil physico-chemical properties in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions in Kandi region of Punjab · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage raised wheat grain yield 0.44% relative to rotavator.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.44 %e0
Comparator
rotavatore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage resulted in 15.5 and 0.44 % higher grain yield of maize and wheat (3.10 and 2.26 t/ha respectively) over rotavator (2.62 and 2.25 t/ha respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–975

Title

Tillage and nutrient-management practices for improving productivity and soil physico-chemical properties in maize (Zea mays)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions in Kandi region of Punjab

A.K. KHOKHAR; S.S. BAWA; SATVINDER SINGH; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v63i3.5648

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-0eb402fc75b5bbdd6b41df5bdc21897a025cbdd242d7a0d9f3dd652c2fc63e60 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.