Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water stress reduced dry forage yield.

A claim from Drought tolerance and stability of native Iranian and foreign tall fescue genotypes: Comparison of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced dry forage yield.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress had a negative effect on dry forage yield and reduced genetic variation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–532
t0

“tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73

Title

Drought tolerance and stability of native Iranian and foreign tall fescue genotypes: Comparison of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses

Fatemeh Saeidnia; Mohammad M. Majidi; Mohammad R Dehghani; et al. Agronomy Journal 2022. doi:10.1002/agj2.21127

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-41d2bc5695ff896355d309d0b071b2b46130ffbec8169458d2daa8b2e14b8787 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.