Paper · 2022 · Plant Cell & Environment

Drought and warming alter gross primary production allocation and reduce productivity in a widespread pasture grass

Manjunatha H. Chandregowda; Mark G. Tjoelker; Sally A. Power; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Carbon allocation determines plant growth, fitness and reproductive success. However, climate warming and drought impacts on carbon allocation patterns in grasses are not well known, particularly following grazing or clipping. A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers and subjected to drought (65% reduction relative to well‐watered controls). Leaf, root and whole‐plant carbon fluxes were measured and linked to growth before and after clipping. Both drought and warming reduced gross primary production and plant biomass. Drought reduced net leaf photosynthesis but increased the leaf respiratory fraction of assimilated carbon. Warming increased root respiration but did not affect either net leaf photosynthesis or leaf respiration. There was no evidence of thermal acclimation. Moreover, root respiratory carbon loss was amplified in the combined drought and warming treatment and, in addition to a negative carbon balance aboveground, explained an enhanced reduction in plant biomass. Plant regrowth following clipping was strongly suppressed by drought, reflecting increased tiller mortality and exacerbated respiratory carbon loss. These findings emphasize the importance of considering carbon allocation patterns in response to grazing or clipping and interactions with climatic factors for sustainable pasture production in a future climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced gross primary production and plant biomass of Festuca arundinacea relative to well-watered controls.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
gross primary production and plant biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
well‐watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both drought and warming reduced gross primary production and plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–604 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to drought (65% reduction relative to well‐watered controls)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming at 30 °C reduced gross primary production and plant biomass of Festuca arundinacea relative to 26 °C.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
warminge1
Outcome
gross primary production and plant biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
26 and 30°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both drought and warming reduced gross primary production and plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced net leaf photosynthesis of Festuca arundinacea.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
droughte4
Outcome
net leaf photosynthesise4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
well‐watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e4

“Drought reduced net leaf photosynthesis but increased the leaf respiratory fraction of assimilated carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to drought (65% reduction relative to well‐watered controls)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased the leaf respiratory fraction of assimilated carbon in Festuca arundinacea.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
droughte4
Outcome
leaf respiratory fraction of assimilated carbone4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
well‐watered controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e4

“Drought reduced net leaf photosynthesis but increased the leaf respiratory fraction of assimilated carbon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–711 · show in text ↑
e2

“subjected to drought (65% reduction relative to well‐watered controls)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming increased root respiration of Festuca arundinacea.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Warminge5
Outcome
root respiratione5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
26 and 30°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e5

“Warming increased root respiration but did not affect either net leaf photosynthesis or leaf respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming did not affect net leaf photosynthesis or leaf respiration of Festuca arundinacea.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Warminge5
Outcome
net leaf photosynthesis or leaf respiratione5
Direction
did not affecte5
Comparator
26 and 30°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e5

“Warming increased root respiration but did not affect either net leaf photosynthesis or leaf respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festuca arundinacea showed no evidence of thermal acclimation.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
thermal acclimatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was no evidence of thermal acclimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root respiratory carbon loss was amplified in the combined drought and warming treatment.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
combined drought and warming treatmente7
Outcome
root respiratory carbon losse7
Direction
amplifiede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e7

“root respiratory carbon loss was amplified in the combined drought and warming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–963 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root respiratory carbon loss together with a negative aboveground carbon balance explained an enhanced reduction in plant biomass under combined drought and warming.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
combined drought and warming treatmente7
Outcome
enhanced reduction in plant biomasse1
Qualifier
root respiratory carbon losse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e7

“root respiratory carbon loss was amplified in the combined drought and warming treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“in addition to a negative carbon balance aboveground, explained an enhanced reduction in plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought strongly suppressed plant regrowth following clipping in Festuca arundinacea.

Taxon
Festuca arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
Plant regrowth following clippinge1
Direction
suppressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A widespread C 3 pasture grass, Festuca arundinacea , was grown at 26 and 30°C in controlled environment chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant regrowth following clipping was strongly suppressed by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1141 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · physiology: respiration · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · molecular: metabolites · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.