Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculants gave better nodule formation in faba bean.

A claim from Evaluation of best performing indigenous Rhizobium strains on productivity of faba bean in Gumer District, south-eastern Ethiopia · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculants gave better nodule formation in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae5
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculantse5
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume5symbiont
Outcome
nodule formatione5
Direction
bettere5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All Rhizobium inoculants for faba bean showed better nodule formation, leading to increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1436

Title

Evaluation of best performing indigenous Rhizobium strains on productivity of faba bean in Gumer District, south-eastern Ethiopia

Lele, Tarekegn Tefera; Kebede, Paulos ketema National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia 2021. doi:10.20372/1jdx5r82

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-429f2003cfc74c3b83011af201956d340aa906fb52a75cc86c0a7f631a792cbc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.