Paper · 2021 · National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia

Evaluation of best performing indigenous Rhizobium strains on productivity of faba bean in Gumer District, south-eastern Ethiopia

Lele, Tarekegn Tefera; Kebede, Paulos ketema

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by legumes is a known way to recycle nitrogen into a plant-available form. The efficiency of nitrogen fixation depends on the legume genotype and requires a host-specific Rhizobia strain for nodule formation and yield enhancement. A field experiment was designed to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains on the yield and yield components of faba bean under rainfed conditions during two consecutive main growing seasons (2019 and 2020). Experiments consisted of a control, 121 kg NPS ha-1, FB 04, FB 1018 and FB 1035, each strain treated separately with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfer (NPS) and Triple superphosphate (TSP) and placed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Rhizobium inoculation showed a highly significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on yield and yield attributes compared to un-inoculated (negative control) treatment. Over the years, the results showed that the inoculated plants gave a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in nodule number and a benefit in grain yield compared to the un-inoculated plants (negative control). Among inoculated treatments numerically, the highest yield (5.87 t ha-1) was recorded with FB 1018 inoculated together with 60 kg ha-1 TSP compared to those without inoculation (absolute control) which gave 2.48 t ha-1. All Rhizobium inoculants for faba bean showed better nodule formation, leading to increased yield, and it is recommended that farmers in the study area and similar agro-ecologies adopt this technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation had a highly significant effect on yield and yield attributes of faba bean compared with un-inoculated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
yield and yield attributese1
Comparator
un-inoculated (negative control) treatmente1
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was designed to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains on the yield and yield components of faba bean under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation showed a highly significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on yield and yield attributes compared to un-inoculated (negative control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased nodule number in faba bean compared with un-inoculated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse3
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was designed to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains on the yield and yield components of faba bean under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation showed a highly significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on yield and yield attributes compared to un-inoculated (negative control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–913 · show in text ↑
e2

“the inoculated plants gave a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in nodule number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1032 · show in text ↑
e3

“a benefit in grain yield compared to the un-inoculated plants (negative control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation gave a benefit in grain yield of faba bean compared with un-inoculated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse3
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was designed to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains on the yield and yield components of faba bean under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation showed a highly significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on yield and yield attributes compared to un-inoculated (negative control) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–913 · show in text ↑
e3

“a benefit in grain yield compared to the un-inoculated plants (negative control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FB 1018 inoculated together with 60 kg ha-1 TSP gave the highest faba bean yield of 5.87 t ha-1, against 2.48 t ha-1 without inoculation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
FB 1018 inoculated together with 60 kg ha-1 TSPe4
Interactor
FB 1018e4symbiont
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
5.87 t ha-1e4
Qualifier
2.48 t ha-1e4
Comparator
those without inoculation (absolute control)e4
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was designed to evaluate the performance of Rhizobium strains on the yield and yield components of faba bean under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest yield (5.87 t ha-1) was recorded with FB 1018 inoculated together with 60 kg ha-1 TSP compared to those without inoculation (absolute control) which gave 2.48 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculants gave better nodule formation in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae5
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculantse5
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume5symbiont
Outcome
nodule formatione5
Direction
bettere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All Rhizobium inoculants for faba bean showed better nodule formation, leading to increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculants increased faba bean yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae5
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculantse5
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume5symbiont
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All Rhizobium inoculants for faba bean showed better nodule formation, leading to increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1436 · show in text ↑
e6

“leading to increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1436 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers in the study area and similar agro-ecologies should adopt the Rhizobium inoculation technology for faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae5
Outcome
adopt this technologye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“All Rhizobium inoculants for faba bean showed better nodule formation, leading to increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1436 · show in text ↑
e7

“it is recommended that farmers in the study area and similar agro-ecologies adopt this technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1539 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

98 papers: 88 positive, 10 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 63 positive, 5 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.