Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Skipping irrigation at the heading stage reduced bread wheat grain yield by 42.9% compared with full irrigation.

A claim from Evaluation of grain yield of some new bread wheat varieties under water stress conditions · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping irrigation at the heading stage reduced bread wheat grain yield by 42.9% compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
irrigations at the heading stage were skippede1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
42.9%e1
Comparator
full irrigatione1
Setting
Fayoum University, Fayoum Governoratee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five cultivars of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were used in this study at Fayoum University, Fayoum Governorate, during 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–165
e1

“The results showed that skipping irrigations had a significant effect on grain yield, with the highest reduction of 42.9% observed when irrigations at the heading stage were skipped compared to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–648

Title

Evaluation of grain yield of some new bread wheat varieties under water stress conditions

Kamal Ghallab; Salah Abd El-Megeed; Zainab Mohamed Labyrinth : Fayoum University Journal Of Science and Interdisciplinary Studies 2024. doi:10.21608/ifjsis.2024.264146.1059

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4572b7d46117b6698bd32fbf3bc23e86a166eb6ba444231a7e19a6f536071ecb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.