Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sandy loam, manure and peat moss significantly increased transplant height and leaf area.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF MEDIA, NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND FOLIAR SPRAY OF GIBBERELLIC ACID ON GROWTH AND MINERAL STATUS OF OLIVE TRANSPLANTS CV. BASHIKA. · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandy loam, manure and peat moss significantly increased transplant height and leaf area.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
sandy loam: manure: peat moss 3:1/2:1/2e0
Outcome
height of transplants , leaves areae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sandy loam: manure: peat moss 3:1/2:1/2 resulted in a significant increase the height of transplants , leaves area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1094
e1

“olive (Olea europaea L.) transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–69

Title

THE EFFECT OF MEDIA, NITROGEN FERTILIZATION AND FOLIAR SPRAY OF GIBBERELLIC ACID ON GROWTH AND MINERAL STATUS OF OLIVE TRANSPLANTS CV. BASHIKA.

Nabil M. Ameen; RAGHD ADNAN ALI Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn 2018. doi:10.33899/magrj.2018.161543

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-458bca78eee140b7f1196c29b3200f71bc7900cb019a69dced7ddbb35fd4847b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

growing medium · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.