Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobacterial soaking had no significant effect on shallot height, leaf number, fresh weight, or oven-dry tuber weight.

A claim from Potential of rhizobacteria plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) in stimulating growth and yield of shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial soaking had no significant effect on shallot height, leaf number, fresh weight, or oven-dry tuber weight.

Treatment
soaking with these rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight and oven-dry weight of tuberse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking with these rhizobacteria had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on the parameters of plant height, number of leaves, fresh weight and oven-dry weight of tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–694
t0

“shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–108

Title

Potential of rhizobacteria plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) in stimulating growth and yield of shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.)

I. Ketut Widnyana; Putu Eka Pasmidi Ariati; I. Wayan Suanda AIP conference proceedings 2024. doi:10.1063/5.0193375

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-45dc1f65af40aa2d18c64e072c03628acaf4aa09153314558b83156247f05e8d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.