Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual phosphorus increased pearl millet grain nitrogen content 7.1%.

A claim from Effect of residual phosphorus, sulphur and biofertilizers on productivity, economics and nutrient content of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum)-pearl millet cropping sequence · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual phosphorus increased pearl millet grain nitrogen content 7.1%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Pt0
Outcome
N and P content of pearl millet graine0
Value
7.1e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N and P content of pearl millet grain (7.1 and 59.1%) and stover (29.2 and 20.0%) over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–799
t0

“phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29

Title

Effect of residual phosphorus, sulphur and biofertilizers on productivity, economics and nutrient content of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum)-pearl millet cropping sequence

B. L. Jat; M. S. Shaktawat The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2003

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-46a134a49e810ca702ee2eb8ee6dd74e16bbc233c4eeda6f442fdbe5d33f8bcc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.