Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drought stress significantly increased percent reproductive abscission of CA‐5.

A claim from Reproductive Abscission and Yield of Irrigated and Drought Stressed Cowpea · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly increased percent reproductive abscission of CA‐5.

Material
CA‐5e6
Treatment
Drought stresse5
Outcome
percent reproductive abscissione6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–189
e5

“Drought stress in the second experiment did not affect production of floral buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1077
e6

“but significantly increased percent reproductive abscission and decreased pod retention of CA‐5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1201

Title

Reproductive Abscission and Yield of Irrigated and Drought Stressed Cowpea

H. Tewolde; A. K. Dobrenz; D. L. Robinson; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1991.tb00903.x

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-46dc775f55e0775138d8cc436903faf2cf4280bb1845bae9b33c76ea55dab4fc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.