Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two lower-dose applications controlled maize infestation for longer when weed emergence was late and uneven.

A claim from Effectiveness of weed control in maize (zea mays L.) depending on the date and method of herbicide application · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two lower-dose applications controlled maize infestation for longer when weed emergence was late and uneven.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
two operations with lower herbicide dosese0
Outcome
maize infestatione0
Direction
limited effectivelye0
Qualifier
late and uneven weed emergencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the conditions of late and uneven weed emergence, the system of two operations with lower herbicide doses limited effectively maize infestation in a longer growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1397
t0

“maize (zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–52

Title

Effectiveness of weed control in maize (zea mays L.) depending on the date and method of herbicide application

R. Kierzek; A. Paradowski; Roman Krawczyk Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Agricultura 2011

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-481ba3c7df17bcb35aa246dea441b444d61a702af6e6ff6794c73dfdd394fe4f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.