Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Single Azotobacter inoculation promoted chickpea growth somewhat.

A claim from Growth, nutrient uptake and yield parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) enhance byRhizobiumandAzotobacterinoculations in saline soil · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single Azotobacter inoculation promoted chickpea growth somewhat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
growth of chickpeae0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The single treatment of either Rhizobium or Azotobacter exhibited to promote the growth of chickpea to some level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–385

Title

Growth, nutrient uptake and yield parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) enhance byRhizobiumandAzotobacterinoculations in saline soil

Anvar Abdiev; Botir Khaitov; Kristina Toderich; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2019. doi:10.1080/01904167.2019.1655038

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-48bb1fa03d592efc4a75e1b6e79da04277266f1dacc06abde3af3a8260658dab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.