Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage with residue gave the most grains per grain row.

A claim from Assessment of conservation agriculture and intercropping practices for enhanced productivity and profitability in maize (Zea mays) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue gave the most grains per grain row.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
ZT + residue at 3 t/hae0
Outcome
number of grains/grain rowe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
CT + residue at 3 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes such as number of gain rows/cob and number of grains/grain row were recorded highest in ZT + residue at 3 t/ha followed by CT + residue at 3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–953
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–143

Title

Assessment of conservation agriculture and intercropping practices for enhanced productivity and profitability in maize (Zea mays)

SEEMA SEPAT; R S BANA; S L MEENA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i4.88872

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-4a3dd79ea71dfcdbe23ddfd464157bf4a6ff047909914addd9a7b361efab473c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.