Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Onion bulb diameter (7.2 cm) was maximum in treatment T3 and also in T11.

A claim from Response of micronutrients on qualitative and quantitative parameters of onion (Allium cepa L.) · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion bulb diameter (7.2 cm) was maximum in treatment T3 and also in T11.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T3 (Zn @ 4mg L−1)e1
Outcome
bulb diametere0
Direction
maximume1
Value
7.2 cme0
Qualifier
T11e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb diameter (7.2 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1147
e1

“were maximum found in treatment T3 (Zn @ 4mg L−1) and T11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1231
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78

Title

Response of micronutrients on qualitative and quantitative parameters of onion (Allium cepa L.)

Khashti Ballabh; D. K. Rana Progressive Horticulture 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-4a7108d826f792db769d109bb304d32d45bba9dc1ab5abec5aad4232f669853d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Direct application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha produced onion growth and yield attributes and bulb yield significantly superior to control.

    Methods of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) establishment and zinc fortification in cotton-based cropping systems: Direct and residual effect on onion (Allium cepa) and system productivity of cottononion cropping system · 2001 · compared with control

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Repeated zinc applications depressed yield from the fifth through eleventh crops.

    Crop Responses to Some Micronutrients and Sodium on Sphagnum Peat Soil · 1964

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
    B, Cu and Zn application did not influence onion yield.

    Growth, nutrient accumulation and yield of onion as a function of micronutrient fertilization · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    The Zn and B combination was better for onion vegetative growth and yield.

    Effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of onion under calcareous soil environment · 2012

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Zn at 50 mg/kg soil slightly increased onion yield, while higher levels reduced yield.

    Effect of Cd, Ni, Pb and Zn on growth and chemical composition of onion and fenugreek · 1990

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Zn foliar application significantly increased onion yield relative to controls.

    Essential oil, growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) in response to foliar application of some micronutrients. · 2009 · compared with control plants

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Foliar Zn with 2,4-D increased onion bulb weight to 73.9 g.

    Effect Of Soil And Foliar Applications Of Zinc And Iron On The Yield And Quality Of Onion (Allium cepa L.) · 2013

    Same direction

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.