Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All berry thinning produced loose clusters.

A claim from Effect of berry Thinning, CPPU spraying and pinching on cluster and berry quality of two grapevine cultivars · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All berry thinning produced loose clusters.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Ruby Seedlesse0
Treatment
berry thinninge2
Outcome
losse clusterse2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“This investigation was carried out at the Experimental orchard, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Egypt, to study the effect of CPPU spraying and pinching on cluster and berry traits of Roomy Red, as well as, effect of berry thinning and GA3 application on cluster and berry traits of Ruby Seedless grapes during 2007 and 2008 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–343
e2

“All berry thinning reduced the berries number and increased the length of clusters, hence induce a pronounced decrease in compactness coefficient and produced losse clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1011

Title

Effect of berry Thinning, CPPU spraying and pinching on cluster and berry quality of two grapevine cultivars

A. El-Salhy; K. A. Amen; alaa masoud; et al. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2009. doi:10.21608/ajas.2010.268803

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-4b4e6cbac0e2b47df64ea98eeb6b47f094e0af399e8b4b4e292776702f5f4ba0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

pruning · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.