Claim · model-written summary
At one orchard, changing rootstock genotype reduced apple replant disease.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- rootstock genotype different from the previous onee0
- Outcome
- ARD developmente0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- previous onee0
- Setting
- one orcharde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In one orchard, replanting trees with a rootstock genotype different from the previous one can be effective in reducing ARD development, susceptibility to ARD is likely to be genetically controlled, and replanting trees in the previous grass aisle can reduce ARD development.”
t0“Rotating Apple Rootstock”
Title
The Effect of Rotating Apple Rootstock Genotypes on Apple Replant Disease and Rhizosphere Microbiome
Greg Deakin; Felicidad Fernández-Fernández; Julie Bennett; et al. Phytobiomes Journal 2019. doi:10.1094/pbiomes-03-19-0018-r
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect At one orchard, planting in the former grass aisle reduced apple replant disease.
- Mechanism Authors infer genetic control of apple replant disease susceptibility.
- Observation The second orchard showed opposite results, possibly linked to missing weed management in the aisle.
- Observation Rootstock-associated rhizosphere microbiota stabilized within seven months.
- Association An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal OTU was less abundant in diseased trees.
- Method / resource Many ARD-associated OTUs could not be assigned to low taxonomic ranks.
- Recommendation The authors recommend considering genetic relationships between rootstocks when rotating them.