Paper · 1965 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

GROWTH INHIBITION PRODUCED BY LEAF EXTRACTS FROM SIZE-CONTROLLING APPLE ROOTSTOCKS

S. R. Miller

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dilute alkali extracts of leaves from size-controlling rootstocks inhibited the growth of stratified apple seeds. Correlation coefficients of −0.9140** and −0.7292* exist between the vigor of the rootstocks and the respective growth of apple and wheat seedlings in the leaf extracts. The crude extract was chromatographed in isopropanol:ammonia:water (10:1:1). Two zones of growth inhibition were detected using a watercress bioassay. These zones were at 0 to 0.1 and 0.4 to 0.5 R f units. The amount of growth made by the watercress was in the same ratio as the known vigor of the rootstocks M.II, M.VII, and M.IX. Measurement of the rate of indoleacetic acid oxidation showed that the material at an R f 0.4 to 0.6 affected IAA breakdown. The more dwarfing rootstocks stimulated the oxidation of IAA. The significance of the results are discussed in relation to the dwarfing of apple rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extracts from size-controlling rootstocks inhibited stratified apple seed growth.

Treatment
Dilute alkali extracts of leaves from size-controlling rootstockse0
Outcome
growth of stratified apple seedse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dilute alkali extracts of leaves from size-controlling rootstocks inhibited the growth of stratified apple seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock vigor correlated negatively with apple seedling growth in leaf extracts.

Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
growth of applee0
Direction
−0.9140**e0
Value
−0.9140**e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation coefficients of −0.9140** and −0.7292* exist between the vigor of the rootstocks and the respective growth of apple and wheat seedlings in the leaf extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–283 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock vigor correlated negatively with wheat seedling growth in leaf extracts.

Treatment
leaf extractse0
Outcome
growth of apple and wheat seedlingse0
Direction
−0.7292*e0
Value
−0.7292*e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation coefficients of −0.9140** and −0.7292* exist between the vigor of the rootstocks and the respective growth of apple and wheat seedlings in the leaf extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two inhibitory zones were found in a watercress bioassay.

Outcome
zones of growth inhibitione0
Value
0 to 0.1 and 0.4 to 0.5 R f unitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two zones of growth inhibition were detected using a watercress bioassay. These zones were at 0 to 0.1 and 0.4 to 0.5 R f units.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watercress growth tracked the known vigor ratio of three apple rootstocks.

Material
rootstocks M.II, M.VII, and M.IXe0
Outcome
amount of growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of growth made by the watercress was in the same ratio as the known vigor of the rootstocks M.II, M.VII, and M.IX.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fraction at R f 0.4 to 0.6 affected IAA breakdown.

Treatment
material at an R f 0.4 to 0.6e0
Outcome
IAA breakdowne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the material at an R f 0.4 to 0.6 affected IAA breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More dwarfing apple rootstocks stimulated IAA oxidation.

Material
rootstockse0
Outcome
oxidation of IAAe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The more dwarfing rootstocks stimulated the oxidation of IAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

grafting · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

alkalinity · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.