Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Tianhong 2, Lvguang and Jonagold were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

A claim from Study of the grafting compatibility of the apple rootstock 12–2, resistant to apple replant diseases (ARD) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Tianhong 2, Lvguang and Jonagold were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagolde3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403

Title

Study of the grafting compatibility of the apple rootstock 12–2, resistant to apple replant diseases (ARD)

Yunfei Mao; Xueli Cui; Haiyan Wang; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2022. doi:10.1186/s12870-022-03847-8

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-bc3ea353feedfc3a157de7249d21529fe8ad5189bf3c0fbb87a7c92d7635d487 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

grafting · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.