Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Apple Autotetraploids—Phenotypic Characterisation and Response to Drought Stress

Danuta Wójcik; Monika Marat; Agnieszka Marasek-Ciołakowska; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
32
citations
6
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Polyploidization is an important source of variability for plant breeding. Polyploids are often characterised by increased resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Since drought and pathogen attack are the main threats to apple cultivation, obtaining new sources of resistance is an important issue for apple breeding. The newly obtained autotetraploid clones of apple cv. ‘Redchief’ showed superior resistance to fire blight. The aim of the presented research was the in-depth phenotypic characterisation of ‘Redchief’ tetraploids and assessment of their response to drought at the physiological and genetic level. The growth of own-rooted five-year-old trees of ‘Redchief’ tetraploids was poor compared with diploids; all growth parameters—the number and length of current season shoots, the total length of current season shoots per tree and the cross-section area of the trunk—were reduced in tetraploid clones. Grafting on M9 rootstock improved the growth characteristics of ‘Redchief’ tetraploids. Compared with diploid plants, the leaves of tetraploids were thicker, with altered shape, higher chlorophyll content, and larger stomata, but the stomatal density decreased. The leaf anatomical structure of tetraploids was changed, the adaxial and abaxial epidermis and both types of mesophyll were significantly thicker than in diploids. Moreover, the pollen grains of tetraploids were larger, but their viability and germination were reduced. Under conditions of limited water supply, the reduction in growth parameters was smaller and the physiological parameters were higher in the ‘Redchief’ tetraploid clone 4x-25 than in diploid plants. The expression of APX gene was higher in tetraploids than in diploids 15 days after drought stress induction. The results suggest the enhanced drought tolerance of the studied ‘Redchief’ autotetraploid clone compared with its diploid counterpart.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redchief autotetraploid clones showed superior fire blight resistance.

Material
‘Redchief’e0
Outcome
resistance to fire blighte0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The newly obtained autotetraploid clones of apple cv. ‘Redchief’ showed superior resistance to fire blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Own-rooted Redchief tetraploid trees had reduced shoot number and length, total shoot length, and trunk cross-section compared with diploids.

Material
‘Redchief’e0
Outcome
the number and length of current season shoots, the total length of current season shoots per tree and the cross-section area of the trunke0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
diploidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of own-rooted five-year-old trees of ‘Redchief’ tetraploids was poor compared with diploids; all growth parameters—the number and length of current season shoots, the total length of current season shoots per tree and the cross-section area of the trunk—were reduced in tetraploid clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on M9 rootstock improved Redchief tetraploid growth.

Material
‘Redchief’e0
Treatment
Grafting on M9 rootstocke0
Outcome
growth characteristicse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting on M9 rootstock improved the growth characteristics of ‘Redchief’ tetraploids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid leaves were thicker and differently shaped than diploid leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
leaves of tetraploidse0
Direction
thickere0
Qualifier
altered shapee0
Comparator
diploid plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with diploid plants, the leaves of tetraploids were thicker, with altered shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid leaves had higher chlorophyll content than diploids.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
diploid plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with diploid plants, the leaves of tetraploids were thicker, with altered shape, higher chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploids had larger stomata and lower stomatal density than diploids.

Outcome
stomatae0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
stomatal density decreasede0
Comparator
diploid plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larger stomata, but the stomatal density decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with diploid plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid leaf epidermis and both mesophyll types were significantly thicker than in diploids.

Organ / stage
adaxial and abaxial epidermis and both types of mesophylle0
Outcome
adaxial and abaxial epidermis and both types of mesophylle0
Direction
thickere0
Comparator
diploidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adaxial and abaxial epidermis and both types of mesophyll were significantly thicker than in diploids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid pollen grains were larger than diploid pollen.

Organ / stage
pollen grainse0
Outcome
pollen grains of tetraploidse0
Direction
largere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pollen grains of tetraploids were larger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid pollen viability and germination were reduced.

Organ / stage
pollen grainse1
Outcome
viability and germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their viability and germination were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pollen grains of tetraploids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1387 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited water, growth reduction was smaller in tetraploid 4x-25 than in diploids.

Material
‘Redchief’ tetraploid clone 4x-25e0
Treatment
limited water supplye0
Outcome
reduction in growth parameterse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
diploid plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of limited water supply, the reduction in growth parameters was smaller and the physiological parameters were higher in the ‘Redchief’ tetraploid clone 4x-25 than in diploid plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under limited water, physiological parameters were higher in tetraploid 4x-25 than in diploids.

Material
‘Redchief’ tetraploid clone 4x-25e0
Treatment
limited water supplye0
Outcome
physiological parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
diploid plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of limited water supply, the reduction in growth parameters was smaller and the physiological parameters were higher in the ‘Redchief’ tetraploid clone 4x-25 than in diploid plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APX expression was higher in tetraploids 15 days after drought induction.

Gene
APXe0
Outcome
expression of APX genee0
Direction
highere0
Value
15 dayse0
Comparator
diploidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of APX gene was higher in tetraploids than in diploids 15 days after drought stress induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer enhanced drought tolerance in Redchief autotetraploid clone versus diploid counterpart.

Material
‘Redchief’e0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
diploid counterparte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced drought tolerance of the studied ‘Redchief’ autotetraploid clone compared with its diploid counterpart”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.