Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly increased groundnut seed zinc content.

A claim from Zinc Biofortification in Sixty Groundnut Cultivars Through Foliar Application of Zinc Sulphate · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly increased groundnut seed zinc content.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
foliar application of 0.2% aqueous solution of zinc sulphatee0
Outcome
seed zinc (Zn) contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 0.2% aqueous solution of zinc sulphate thrice at 40, 55 and 70 days at 500, 500 and 1000 L ha−1, respectively, increased the number of pods, pod yield, shelling and 100 seed mass and seed zinc (Zn) content, significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–353
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–40

Title

Zinc Biofortification in Sixty Groundnut Cultivars Through Foliar Application of Zinc Sulphate

A. L. Singh; V. Chaudhari Journal of Plant Nutrition 2015. doi:10.1080/01904167.2015.1042165

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-4db034202906a522a568192815054f3592fb56681ab8a39ed169d895e3a6b058 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

application · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.