Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Uniform row planting had higher total productivity than paired rows.

A claim from Weed suppressing ability and productivity of short duration legumes intercroppped with pigeonpea under rainfed conditions · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniform row planting had higher total productivity than paired rows.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
uniform row planting pattern (pigeonpea rows at 60 cm with one row of intercrop in between)e0
Outcome
total productivitye0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
paired row planting at 40/80 cm distancee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping under uniform row planting pattern (pigeonpea rows at 60 cm with one row of intercrop in between) was more efficient in weed suppression as well as in total productivity compared with paired row planting at 40/80 cm distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–507

Title

Weed suppressing ability and productivity of short duration legumes intercroppped with pigeonpea under rainfed conditions

Masood Ali Tropical Pest Management 1988. doi:10.1080/09670878809371282

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-4e0847aa8a010031806c9e044ed86dcb67fefa64ff54e62ea547c2f22147df03 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.