Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Complex fertilizer and plant protection application increased conditional net income by 1534.3-1902.7 rubles/ha compared with intensive traditional technology.

A claim from Quality of spring wheat grain at cultivating with modern technologies · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizer and plant protection application increased conditional net income by 1534.3-1902.7 rubles/ha compared with intensive traditional technology.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
Complex application of fertilizers and plant protection productse1
Outcome
conditional net incomee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
1534.3-1902.7 rubles/hae1
Comparator
intensive background of traditional technologye1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring durum wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–195
e1

“Complex application of fertilizers and plant protection products providing the same productivity and quality of grain, in comparison with the intensive background of traditional technology, contributed to an increase in conditional net income and profitability by 1534.3-1902.7 rubles/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–946

Title

Quality of spring wheat grain at cultivating with modern technologies

E.V. Sherbinina; O.I. Goryanin; B.Zh. Dzhangabaev; et al. The Agrarian Scientific Journal 2018. doi:10.28983/asj.v0i12.655

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-4ea773c2b0a20f39cea2c2cca28d6d13f916d1a65397b78442f724b5020df976 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.