Paper · 2021 · Field Crops Research

Dry sowing reduced durum wheat performance under irrigated conservation agriculture

Kathrin Grahmann; Nora Honsdorf; Jose Crossa; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Permanent raised beds (PB) are a conservation agriculture option for irrigated conditions that can improve soil quality, increase soil moisture conservation and stabilize yields compared to conventional furrow irrigation. In irrigated wheat (Triticum sp.) production, wet sowing (i.e. applying irrigation before sowing) is most widely used. It allows pre-sowing weed control but reduces sowing time flexibility. Dry sowing, i.e. applying irrigation after sowing, reduces options for weed control but improves water use efficiency and sowing time flexibility. This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico. In those four tillage-sowing irrigation environments (ENV), five nitrogen (N) fertilization treatments were tested. Plant stand, grain yield, and grain quality were measured for ten years and fertilizer-based N use efficiency indices were assessed in three years. Plant stand, wheat yield and quality were significantly affected by ENV. The lowest plant stand and yield were found in PB-Dry sowing. On average, only 54 plants m-2 emerged in PB-Dry whereas 159 plants m-2 emerged in CTB-Wet. Plant stand showed high yearly fluctuations, with plant stand in dry sowing favored by lower reference evapotranspiration, with CTB-Dry favored more by high minimum temperature and PB-Dry by high maximum temperature. Yield ranged between 4.20 and 7.94 t ha-1. Yield in PB-Dry was on average 0.35 to 0.50 t ha-1 lower than in the remaining ENV, but positive interactions between year and dry sowing systems were associated with high minimum temperatures at germination and tillering. N fertilization management affected wheat quality, but not wheat yield, possibly due to high levels of soil mineral N available at sowing that were not measured in this study. Split application of N increased grain N content compared to basal N application. Research should address reduced plant stands with dry sowing in conservation agriculture to find management options that improve wheat emergence. Further efforts to optimize N fertilizer management in PB are required to improve grain quality components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant stand differed among tillage and sowing environments.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
Plant stande1
Setting
northwestern Mexicoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant stand, wheat yield and quality were significantly affected by ENV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1056 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield differed among tillage and sowing environments.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
wheat yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant stand, wheat yield and quality were significantly affected by ENV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1056 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat quality differed among tillage and sowing environments.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant stand, wheat yield and quality were significantly affected by ENV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1056 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB-Dry had the lowest plant stand, averaging 54 plants m-2 versus 159 in CTB-Wet.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
PB-Drye1
Outcome
plants m-2 emergede1
Direction
onlye1
Value
54 plants m-2e1
Qualifier
159 plants m-2e1
Comparator
CTB-Wete1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On average, only 54 plants m-2 emerged in PB-Dry whereas 159 plants m-2 emerged in CTB-Wet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1210 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB-Dry had the lowest yield.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
PB-Dry sowinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The lowest plant stand and yield were found in PB-Dry sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1118 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant stand fluctuated substantially by year.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
Plant stande1
Qualifier
high yearly fluctuationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant stand showed high yearly fluctuations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1254 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower reference evapotranspiration favored plant stand in dry sowing.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
dry sowinge1
Outcome
plant stande1
Direction
favorede1
Qualifier
lower reference evapotranspiratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“plant stand in dry sowing favored by lower reference evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1332 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High minimum temperature favored plant stand in CTB-Dry.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
CTB-Drye1
Outcome
CTB-Dry favored moree1
Direction
favored moree1
Qualifier
high minimum temperaturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CTB-Dry favored more by high minimum temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1387 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High maximum temperature favored plant stand in PB-Dry.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
PB-Drye1
Outcome
PB-Drye1
Qualifier
high maximum temperaturee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“PB-Dry by high maximum temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1426 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield ranged from 4.20 to 7.94 t ha-1.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
Yielde1
Value
4.20 and 7.94 t ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield ranged between 4.20 and 7.94 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1470 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PB-Dry yield averaged 0.35 to 0.50 t ha-1 below the other environments.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
PB-Drye1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Value
0.35 to 0.50 t ha-1e1
Comparator
the remaining ENVe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yield in PB-Dry was on average 0.35 to 0.50 t ha-1 lower than in the remaining ENV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1553 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High minimum temperatures at germination and tillering were associated with positive year by dry sowing yield interactions.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Organ / stage
germination and tilleringe1
Treatment
dry sowing systemse1
Outcome
positive interactionse1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
high minimum temperaturese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“positive interactions between year and dry sowing systems were associated with high minimum temperatures at germination and tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1692 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization management affected wheat quality.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
N fertilization managemente1
Outcome
wheat qualitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“N fertilization management affected wheat quality, but not wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1764 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization management did not affect wheat yield.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
N fertilization managemente1
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
note1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“N fertilization management affected wheat quality, but not wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1764 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split N application increased grain N content relative to basal application.

Taxon
Triticum durum L.Triticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
Split application of Ne1
Outcome
grain N contente1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
basal N applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Split application of N increased grain N content compared to basal N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1951 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study evaluated the performance of durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) under conventionally tilled (CTB) and PB with wet and dry sowing in northwestern Mexico.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–719 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend addressing reduced plant stands under dry sowing in conservation agriculture.

Outcome
management options that improve wheat emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research should address reduced plant stands with dry sowing in conservation agriculture to find management options that improve wheat emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimizing N fertilizer management in PB to improve grain quality components.

Outcome
optimize N fertilizer management in PBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further efforts to optimize N fertilizer management in PB are required to improve grain quality components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2098–2205 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.