Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Differences in yields due to pruning treatment were small and not significant.

A claim from Effects of Plant Density, Training, and Pruning on Blackberry Yield1 · 1972

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in yields due to pruning treatment were small and not significant.

Taxon
BlackberryRubust0
Treatment
pruning treatmente0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
smalle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Blackberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61
e0

“Differences in yields due to pruning treatment were small and not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–551

Title

Effects of Plant Density, Training, and Pruning on Blackberry Yield1

W. A. Sheets; R. M. Bullock; R. Garren Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1972. doi:10.21273/jashs.97.2.262

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4eb69237c4152fbe94fa462e428c0e9f3021abaefe5a46fb8995d232c89fe739 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.