Paper · 1990 · HortScience

OUTLOOK FOR MECHANIZATION IN SMALL FRUIT CROPS

Charles Mainland

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Mechanized harvest for processing markets has become commercially accepted for blackberries (Rubus sp.), highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum), lowbush (V. angustifolium) and rabbiteye (V. ashei), blueberries, cranberries (V. macrocarpon), grapes (Vitus labruscana, V. vinifera, V. rotundifolia, V. sp.), raspberries (Rubus ideaus) and to a lesser extent for strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa). Fruit bruising during harvest and sorting often contributes to reduced “eye appeal” and keeping quality for fresh sales. Highbush and rabbiteye blueberries are successfully machine harvested for fresh markets, however, high temperature and rain will often make product quality unacceptable. Highbush blueberries grown in cool climates and rabbiteye blueberries with greater inherent resistance to bruising have most consistently given acceptable quality. Cultivar improvement and equipment that causes less bruising during harvest and sorting will be required for increased mechanization for fresh markets. Mechanical pruning of blackberries, blueberries, grapes and raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%. The audience will be involved in discussion of advancements in mechanization techniques.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanized harvest for processing markets is commercially accepted for the listed small fruit crops, and less so for strawberries.

Taxon
SMALL FRUIT CROPSt0
Treatment
Mechanized harveste0
Outcome
commercially acceptede0

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanized harvest for processing markets has become commercially accepted for blackberries (Rubus sp.), highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum), lowbush (V. angustifolium) and rabbiteye (V. ashei), blueberries, cranberries (V. macrocarpon), grapes (Vitus labruscana, V. vinifera, V. rotundifolia, V. sp.), raspberries (Rubus ideaus) and to a lesser extent for strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“SMALL FRUIT CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bruising during harvest and sorting often reduces fresh fruit eye appeal and keeping quality.

Taxon
SMALL FRUIT CROPSt0
Treatment
Fruit bruising during harvest and sortinge0
Outcome
“eye appeal” and keeping qualitye0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit bruising during harvest and sorting often contributes to reduced “eye appeal” and keeping quality for fresh sales.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“SMALL FRUIT CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature and rain often make machine harvested highbush and rabbiteye blueberry quality unacceptable for fresh markets.

Taxon
blueberriese0
Outcome
product quality unacceptablee0
Qualifier
high temperature and raine0

Verbatim

e0

“Highbush and rabbiteye blueberries are successfully machine harvested for fresh markets, however, high temperature and rain will often make product quality unacceptable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highbush blueberries in cool climates and bruise-resistant rabbiteye blueberries most consistently yielded acceptable quality.

Taxon
blueberriese0
Outcome
acceptable qualitye0
Qualifier
cool climatese0

Verbatim

e0

“Highbush blueberries grown in cool climates and rabbiteye blueberries with greater inherent resistance to bruising have most consistently given acceptable quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–843 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar improvement and equipment that reduces bruising are required to increase mechanization for fresh markets.

Taxon
SMALL FRUIT CROPSt0
Outcome
increased mechanization for fresh marketse0

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar improvement and equipment that causes less bruising during harvest and sorting will be required for increased mechanization for fresh markets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“SMALL FRUIT CROPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical pruning of blackberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.

Taxon
blackberriesRubuse0
Treatment
Mechanical pruninge0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
up to 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical pruning of blackberries, blueberries, grapes and raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical pruning of blueberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.

Taxon
blueberriese0
Treatment
Mechanical pruninge0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
up to 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical pruning of blackberries, blueberries, grapes and raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical pruning of grapes can reduce costs by up to 80%.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Mechanical pruninge0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
up to 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical pruning of blackberries, blueberries, grapes and raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical pruning of raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.

Taxon
raspberriese0
Treatment
Mechanical pruninge0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
up to 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical pruning of blackberries, blueberries, grapes and raspberries can reduce costs by up to 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1098 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · VacciniumResults differ

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

pruning · yield · Rubus (bramble)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pruning · yield · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.