Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chitosan (1.5%) coating maintained higher fruit appearance score in guava fruits than uncoated fruits.

A claim from Post-harvest changes in functional and sensory properties of guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Pant Prabhat) fruits as influenced by different edible coating treatments · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan (1.5%) coating maintained higher fruit appearance score in guava fruits than uncoated fruits.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Pant Prabhat)Psidium guajavat0
Material
Pant Prabhatt0
Treatment
chitosan (1.5%) coatinge1
Outcome
fruit appearancee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.32e1
Comparator
uncoated fruitse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Pant Prabhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–104
e0

“while the uncoated fruits serve as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–517
e1

“In all treatments, chitosan (1.5%) coating was effective in maintaining superoxide dismutase activity (69.48 units/g fruit weight), total phenolics content (333.35 mg GAE/100 g fresh weight), fruit appearance (8.32), fruit flavour (8.21) and fruit texture (8.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–781

Title

Post-harvest changes in functional and sensory properties of guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Pant Prabhat) fruits as influenced by different edible coating treatments

Ankit Kumar; Omveer Singh; Karishma Kohli Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-4ed070dff859c49c1cb9eabf9b2d4688438d64ce5a505be205d86cc346aed218 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 42 positive, 4 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.