Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil Fe to 3.48 ppm compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- Fee6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 3.48 ppme6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Title
ANIL KUMAR; L K CHUGH; DEV VART YADAV; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.56093/ijas.v86i2.55963
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Balanced fertilizers with 5.0 t FYM/ha raised pearl millet grain yield by 7.5 per cent compared with no FYM.
- Intervention effect Balanced fertilizers with 5.0 t FYM/ha raised mustard seed yield by 8.2 per cent compared with no FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 combination gave the maximum pearl millet grain yield, 3.91 tonnes/ha.
- Intervention effect The F5 combination gave the maximum mustard seed yield, 2.31 t/ha.
- Intervention effect The F5 combination gave the maximum pearl millet equivalent yield, 11.91 t/ha.
- Intervention effect The F5 combination gave the maximum gross returns, Rupees93 051/ha.
- Intervention effect The F4 treatment gave the maximum net returns, Rupees 44 529/ha.
- Intervention effect The F4 treatment gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio, 1:93.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment decreased soil pH to 7.8 compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment decreased soil EC to 0.33 ds/m compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil organic carbon to 0.37% compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil available N to 205 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil P2O5 to 17.7 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil K2O to 331 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil Zn to 2.30 ppm compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect The F5 treatment improved soil S to 4.30 ppm, as the paper states, compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Intervention effect Protein content, oil content and oil yield were superior in the F5 treatment than in all other balanced-fertilizer combinations with and without FYM.