Abstract
The experiment was conducted at the research farm of Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar from 2007-08 to 2009-10 to study the effect of farmyard manure and balanced fertilizers on production potential, economic viability and soil properties in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence. The study consisted of 12 treatment combinations of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers with micronutrients were laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications. The mean data revealed that use of balanced fertilizers (Potash, gypsum, ZnSO4 and FeSO4) along with application of 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha in pearl millet-mustard crop sequence produced 7.5 per cent higher pearl millet grain yield (3.59 tonnes/ha) and 8.2 per cent more mustard seed yield (1.96 tonnes/ha) than no FYM application (3.34 tonnes/ha by pearl millet and 1.81 tonnes/ha by mustard). Among different balanced nutrient treatments; recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorous for both the crops, i.e. 120 kg N + 60 kg P/ha for pearl millet and 80 kg N + 30 kg P/ha for mustard along with 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5) produced maximum pearl millet grain yield (3.91 tonnes/ha) and mustard seed yield (2.31 t/ha), pearl millet equivalent yield (11.91 t/ha) and gross returns (Rupees93 051/ha) whereas, maximum net returns (RUPEES 44 529 /ha) and B:C ratio (1:93) were observed in the treatment 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4). The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used. The quality traits; protein content in pearl millet, oil content and oil yield were also found superior in the F5 treament than all other combinations of balanced fertilizers with and without 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Balanced fertilizers with 5.0 t FYM/ha raised pearl millet grain yield by 7.5 per cent compared with no FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- balanced fertilizers (Potash, gypsum, ZnSO4 and FeSO4) along with application of 5.0 tonnes FYM/hae2
- Outcome
- pearl millet grain yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 7.5 per cente2
- Comparator
- no FYM applicatione2
- Setting
- Hisare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The experiment was conducted at the research farm of Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar from 2007-08 to 2009-10”
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e2“use of balanced fertilizers (Potash, gypsum, ZnSO4 and FeSO4) along with application of 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha in pearl millet-mustard crop sequence produced 7.5 per cent higher pearl millet grain yield (3.59 tonnes/ha) and 8.2 per cent more mustard seed yield (1.96 tonnes/ha) than no FYM application (3.34 tonnes/ha by pearl millet and 1.81 tonnes/ha by mustard)”
Claim · model-written summary
Balanced fertilizers with 5.0 t FYM/ha raised mustard seed yield by 8.2 per cent compared with no FYM.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e2“use of balanced fertilizers (Potash, gypsum, ZnSO4 and FeSO4) along with application of 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha in pearl millet-mustard crop sequence produced 7.5 per cent higher pearl millet grain yield (3.59 tonnes/ha) and 8.2 per cent more mustard seed yield (1.96 tonnes/ha) than no FYM application (3.34 tonnes/ha by pearl millet and 1.81 tonnes/ha by mustard)”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 combination gave the maximum pearl millet grain yield, 3.91 tonnes/ha.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5)e3
- Outcome
- pearl millet grain yielde3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 3.91 tonnes/hae3
- Comparator
- Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e3“5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5) produced maximum pearl millet grain yield (3.91 tonnes/ha) and mustard seed yield (2.31 t/ha), pearl millet equivalent yield (11.91 t/ha) and gross returns (Rupees93 051/ha)”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 combination gave the maximum mustard seed yield, 2.31 t/ha.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e3“5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5) produced maximum pearl millet grain yield (3.91 tonnes/ha) and mustard seed yield (2.31 t/ha), pearl millet equivalent yield (11.91 t/ha) and gross returns (Rupees93 051/ha)”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 combination gave the maximum pearl millet equivalent yield, 11.91 t/ha.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5)e3
- Outcome
- pearl millet equivalent yielde3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 11.91 t/hae3
- Comparator
- Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e3“5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5) produced maximum pearl millet grain yield (3.91 tonnes/ha) and mustard seed yield (2.31 t/ha), pearl millet equivalent yield (11.91 t/ha) and gross returns (Rupees93 051/ha)”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 combination gave the maximum gross returns, Rupees93 051/ha.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5)e3
- Outcome
- gross returnse3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- Rupees93 051/hae3
- Comparator
- Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e3“5.0 tonnes FYM/ha + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum +10 kg ZnSO4 /ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha (F5) produced maximum pearl millet grain yield (3.91 tonnes/ha) and mustard seed yield (2.31 t/ha), pearl millet equivalent yield (11.91 t/ha) and gross returns (Rupees93 051/ha)”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The F4 treatment gave the maximum net returns, Rupees 44 529/ha.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)e5
- Outcome
- net returnse5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- RUPEES 44 529 /hae5
- Comparator
- Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
e5“maximum net returns (RUPEES 44 529 /ha) and B:C ratio (1:93) were observed in the treatment 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)”
Claim · model-written summary
The F4 treatment gave the maximum benefit-cost ratio, 1:93.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)e5
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 1:93e5
- Comparator
- Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e4“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”
e5“maximum net returns (RUPEES 44 529 /ha) and B:C ratio (1:93) were observed in the treatment 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment decreased soil pH to 7.8 compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- pHe6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 7.8e6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment decreased soil EC to 0.33 ds/m compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- ECe6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 0.33 ds/me6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil organic carbon to 0.37% compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- organic carbone6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 0.37%e6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil available N to 205 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- available Ne6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 205 kg/hae6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil P2O5 to 17.7 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- P2O5e6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 17.7 kg/hae6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil K2O to 331 kg/ha compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- K2Oe6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 331 kg/hae6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil Fe to 3.48 ppm compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- Fee6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 3.48 ppme6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil Zn to 2.30 ppm compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- Zne6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 2.30 ppme6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
The F5 treatment improved soil S to 4.30 ppm, as the paper states, compared with the RD of N and P treatment without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
- Treatment
- F5 treatmente6
- Outcome
- Se6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Value
- 4.30 ppme6
- Comparator
- RD of N and Pe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e6“The F5 treatment decreased pH (7.8) and EC (0.33 ds/m), improved the organic carbon (0.37%), available N (205 kg/ha), P2O5 (17.7 kg/ha), K2O (331 kg/ha), Fe (3.48 ppm), Zn (2.30 ppm) and S (4.30 ppm) status in comparison to values of 8.0 and 0.36. ds/m 0.34%, 196 kg/ha, 17.3 kg/ha, 323.7 kg/ha, 3.36 ppm, 2.15 ppm and 4.45 ppm, respectively in RD of N and P + 20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnSO4/ha + 10 kg FeSO4/ha treatment when no FYM was used”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content, oil content and oil yield were superior in the F5 treatment than in all other balanced-fertilizer combinations with and without FYM.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanuse7
- Treatment
- F5e7
- Outcome
- oil content and oil yielde7
- Direction
- superiore7
- Qualifier
- protein content in pearl millete7
- Comparator
- all other combinations of balanced fertilizerse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”
e7“The quality traits; protein content in pearl millet, oil content and oil yield were also found superior in the F5 treament than all other combinations of balanced fertilizers with and without 5.0 tonnes FYM/ha”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →lime · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
146 papers more in this group
See all 150 papers →fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
255 papers more in this group
See all 259 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.