Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F4 treatment gave the maximum net returns, Rupees 44 529/ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse1
Treatment
5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)e5
Outcome
net returnse5
Direction
maximume5
Value
RUPEES 44 529 /hae5
Comparator
Among different balanced nutrient treatmentse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]- mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. and Coss.] cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–410
e4

“Among different balanced nutrient treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1035
e5

“maximum net returns (RUPEES 44 529 /ha) and B:C ratio (1:93) were observed in the treatment 5.0 t FYM /ha + RD of N and P +20 kg K2O/ha + 200 kg gypsum/ha + 10 kg ZnS04 kg/ha (F4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1644

Title

Effect of farmyard manure, organic manure and balanced fertilizers application on the productivity and soil fertility in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)- mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping sequence in sandy loam soil of semi-arid regions

ANIL KUMAR; L K CHUGH; DEV VART YADAV; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.56093/ijas.v86i2.55963

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-786fc09d96a2a89fe51ebc4479e366da4d8c785676c9ac5ab89c95eeb39b25b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

lime · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.