Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T14 had significantly higher plant nitrogen content of 1.40%.

A claim from Nutrient Status of Soil and Plant and Total Biomass as Influenced by Liquid Formulations of EM Consortia with Graded Levels of NPK in Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Double Orange · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T14 had significantly higher plant nitrogen content of 1.40%.

Taxon
Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Double OrangeTagetes erectat0
Treatment
75 % RDF + Azotobacter + Bacillus megaterium + Frateuria aurantiae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus megateriumPriestia megateriume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.40 %e0
Qualifier
Frateuria aurantiae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · Second interactorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Double Orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–180
e0

“Significantly higher nitrogen (1.40 %), phosphorus (0.97 %) and potassium content (2.91 %) in the plant was recorded in the treatment which received 75 % RDF + Azotobacter + Bacillus megaterium + Frateuria aurantia (T14), 100 % RDF + Azotobacter + Bacillus megaterium (T9) and 100 % RDF + Bacillus megaterium + Frateuria aurantia (T13), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–783

Title

Nutrient Status of Soil and Plant and Total Biomass as Influenced by Liquid Formulations of EM Consortia with Graded Levels of NPK in Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Double Orange

C.H. Ravi; B. Hemla Naik; G.S. Chaithra; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.174

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-4f2565bbeb23ddeac5949ef570076ec1f613c64b5c5ff1f9ee79adf66953ca7f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Tagetes erecta (African marigold)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    FYM up to 30 t ha-1 improved N, P, K, Zn and Fe content in plants.

    Influence of FYM, Inorganic Fertilizers and Micronutrients on Soil Nutrient Status and Plant Nutrient Contents and their Uptake by African Marigold (Tagetes erecta Linn.) · 2017

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Total nitrogen and phosphorus absorption of Tagetes erecta increase gradually with sludge compost application ratios of 0~5%

    Effects of Sewage Sludge Compost on Growth and Heavy Metal Accumulation in Horticultural Plants · 2010

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Nutrient use was high when fertilizer was applied through drip irrigation.

    Effect of Fertigation through Drip Irrigation on Yield and Flowering of African Marigold (Tagetes erecta Linn) · 2018

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Most fertilization treatments increased K in leaves and stems.

    RESPONSE OF SUMMER ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS TO CHEMICAL, ORGANIC AND BIO-FERTILIZATION TREATMENTS. II- AFRICAN MARIGOLD (Tagetes erecta L.) PLANTS · 2007

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Irrigation at 1.0 Evapo-replenishment with fertigation at 100% RDF and polyethylene mulching gave the highest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake in both seasons.

    Nutrient uptake by African marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.) as influenced by fertigation, irrigation and mulching · 2018

    Same direction

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.