Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Osmopriming with CaCl2 reduced the time to 50% emergence and the mean emergence time of spring maize relative to the controls.

A claim from Seed Priming Improves the Performance of Late Sown Spring Maize (Zea mays) Through Better Crop Stand and Physiological Attributes · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmopriming with CaCl2 reduced the time to 50% emergence and the mean emergence time of spring maize relative to the controls.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
osmopriming with CaCl 2e2
Outcome
time to 50% emergencee2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
Hydro-priming and dry seeds without priminge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–74
e1

“Hydro-priming and dry seeds without priming were taken as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–906
e2

“osmopriming with CaCl 2 reduced the time to 50% emergence (E 50 ), mean emergence time (MET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025

Title

Seed Priming Improves the Performance of Late Sown Spring Maize (Zea mays) Through Better Crop Stand and Physiological Attributes

Wajid Mahboob; Hafeez ur Rehman; Shahzad Maqsood Ahmad Basra; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2015. doi:10.17957/ijab/17.3.14.283

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-4fa810a20c1d777a4f04c1d65d220c7fbc8d8b8f30e14c23823daf6fd944dc72 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

calcium dichloride · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 239 positive, 28 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.