Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and/or PGPR did not significantly influence N, P and K uptake or energy indices.

A claim from Productivity, nutrient uptake, energy indices and profitability of soybean (Glycine max) as influenced by planting methods, Bradyrhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and/or PGPR did not significantly influence N, P and K uptake or energy indices.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and/or PGPRe4
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume4symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe4other
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by seed and straw and energy indicese4
Direction
did not influencee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ludhiana, Punjab to study the effect of planting methods, viz. Happy seeder sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–198
e4

“Seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and/or PGPR did not influence N, P and K uptake by seed and straw and energy indices significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1108
e5

“productivity and profitability of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–477

Title

Productivity, nutrient uptake, energy indices and profitability of soybean (Glycine max) as influenced by planting methods, Bradyrhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

HARPREET KAUR VIRK; GURIQBAL SINGH; POONAM SHARMA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i3.4119

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4fcba8d74bbccc8e54e4d722b5659df77b2b6157e6b591f40953f172cdf66151 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Bradyrhizobium · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

179 papers: 170 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 170 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.