Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A corn herbicide program with two sites of action gave only 35% control of multiple herbicide-resistant A. tuberculatus, lower than a three-site program.

A claim from Multi-tactic strategies to manage herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in corn–soybean rotations of the U.S. Midwest · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A corn herbicide program with two sites of action gave only 35% control of multiple herbicide-resistant A. tuberculatus, lower than a three-site program.

Treatment
herbicide program used in corn with two sites of actione1
Interactor
A. tuberculatusAmaranthus tuberculatuse1weed
Outcome
control of MHR A. tuberculatuse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
35%e1
Comparator
herbicide program with three sites of actione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus tuberculatus
Amaranthus tuberculatus · InteractorLottery Discountz · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A herbicide program used in corn with two sites of action provided only 35% control of MHR A. tuberculatus compared with ≥97% control by a herbicide program with three sites of action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–803

Title

Multi-tactic strategies to manage herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in corn–soybean rotations of the U.S. Midwest

Ramawatar Yadav; Prashant Jha; Robert Hartzler; et al. Weed Science 2023. doi:10.1017/wsc.2023.10

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-5163d009c61f11c38cc1883c87bf2a7662c6cf5aac6c70ccea48ec7e4e3e535d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Amaranthus tuberculatus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.