Claim · model-written summary
Slurry injection trended toward 2% higher yield.
- Treatment
- slurry injectione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- +2%e0
- Qualifier
- on average for 8 sitese0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a trend to higher yield (+2% on average for 8 sites) and N-uptake (+3%) for slurry injection”
t0“maize growth was assessed”
Title
Carl-Philipp Federolf; Matthias Westerschulte; Hans-Werner Olfs; et al. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2015. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.285
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Slurry injection showed no significant yield difference from broadcast application with starter fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Slurry injection showed no significant quality difference from broadcast application with starter fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Slurry injection showed no significant nutrient uptake difference from broadcast application with starter fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Slurry injection trended toward 3% higher nitrogen uptake.
- Intervention effect Slurry injection with nitrification inhibitor increased yield by 4%.
- Intervention effect Slurry injection with nitrification inhibitor gave 6% higher nitrogen uptake.
- Recommendation The authors conclude slurry injection might reduce nitrogen and phosphorus input in maize growing.