Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop reduced straw yield to 4.31 g per pot at the higher rate.

A claim from Grain yield and NPK uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by nitrogen, vermicompost and herbicide (Clodinafop propargyl) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop reduced straw yield to 4.31 g per pot at the higher rate.

Treatment
Clodinafop propargyle1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
decreasedt1
Value
4.31 g pot-1e0
Comparator
control (without C. propargyl)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of straw yield from 7.16 to 5.87 and to 4.31 g pot-1, respectively over control (without C. propargyl).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–718
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–58
t1

“significantly decreased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–553
e1

“Use of Clodinafop propargyl at 60 and 90 g a.i. ha-1 significantly decreased the grain yield of wheat from 4.74 to 3.60 and to 2.93 g pot-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–605

Title

Grain yield and NPK uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by nitrogen, vermicompost and herbicide (Clodinafop propargyl)

S Sheoran H; S Duhan B; S Grewal K; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2015. doi:10.5897/ajar2015.9918

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-52d2e97df0cedbae414e76ae632dcb92266a8d6f5ce39287007ea4acbeeb8999 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.