Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop – Propargyl gave higher plant height and dry matter accumulation than untreated control.

A claim from Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop – Propargyl gave higher plant height and dry matter accumulation than untreated control.

Treatment
Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DASe0
Outcome
plant height and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth attributes i.e. plant height and dry matter accumulation were found higher in Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DAS while least growth attributes was recorded under untreated control during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1998
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103

Title

Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Dee pa; Y.V. Singh; Suruchi Tyagi International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.315

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-71b6e1b2dfd2a4a3413e0642c937660f9cca623b83e13d8262a496504a982323 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.