Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Herbicide-treated wheat had higher 1000-grain weight than the control.

A claim from Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated wheat had higher 1000-grain weight than the control.

Treatment
Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DASe1
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no weedicide controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treated plots exhibited significantly higher number of grains per spike (57.14 and 59.87), grain weight per spike (7.05 and 7.23 g) and 1000-grain weight than no weedicide control during respective years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2207
e1

“Clodinafop – Propargyl 60 g ha-1 at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1908
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103

Title

Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Dee pa; Y.V. Singh; Suruchi Tyagi International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.315

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-1d6bd13ef16dd2b2e476b54c9c3faa8a886ca04df8b4f51738c63bbcc20092cf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.