Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation raised dry matter accumulation.

A claim from Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation raised dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
Azotobacter inoculatede0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
Dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter accumulation was higher with Azotobacter inoculated than uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–966
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103

Title

Effect of Biofertilizer, Herbicide Application and Nitrogen Management on Growth, Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Dee pa; Y.V. Singh; Suruchi Tyagi International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.315

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-a4f08dc3a64d2f6eaeb59b516c23a51cc308dacaf99815aa81ebc960a126e476 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

88 papers: 87 positive, 1 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.