Intervention effectmodel-written summary

For wheat, 100% ET-HS irrigation gave the highest number of fertile spikes, grains per spike and 1000 grain weight.

A claim from Assessment of ET-HS Model for Estimating Crop Water Demand and Its Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Barley and Wheat in Semi-Arid Region of Iran · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For wheat, 100% ET-HS irrigation gave the highest number of fertile spikes, grains per spike and 1000 grain weight.

Treatment
irrigation treatment on the basis of 100% ET-HS modele0
Outcome
number of fertile spike, number of grain per spike, 1000 grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat experiment, the highest number of fertile spike, number of grain per spike, 1000 grain weight, grain yield, biological yield was obtained for irrigation treatment on the basis of 100% ET-HS model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1292

Title

Assessment of ET-HS Model for Estimating Crop Water Demand and Its Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Barley and Wheat in Semi-Arid Region of Iran

A. Soleymani; M.H. Shahrajabian Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 2017. doi:10.1515/cerce-2017-0034

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-5333177531f0045fe9b9697ad24201c925fe49b2ded74ba465fff7caa2af4fee · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.