Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher glufosinate rates often improved weed control.

A claim from Influence of Herbicide Application Rate, Timing, and Interrow Cultivation on Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Yield in Glufosinate-Resistant and Glyphosate-Resistant Corn · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher glufosinate rates often improved weed control.

Treatment
glufosinatee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing rates of glufosinate and glyphosate often improved weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–424
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109

Title

Influence of Herbicide Application Rate, Timing, and Interrow Cultivation on Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Yield in Glufosinate-Resistant and Glyphosate-Resistant Corn

Brent E. Tharp; James J. Kells Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00042263

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-53a390a7eda2a8cc34676ce9d159705755621b09184515660d5de98278568955 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glufosinate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.