Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha gave the most consistent weed control.

A claim from Influence of Herbicide Application Rate, Timing, and Interrow Cultivation on Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Yield in Glufosinate-Resistant and Glyphosate-Resistant Corn · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha gave the most consistent weed control.

Treatment
glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/hae0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
most consistente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control was most consistent from late postemergence (LPOST) applications of glufosinate at 0.41 kg ai/ha or glyphosate at 0.84 kg ae/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–657
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109

Title

Influence of Herbicide Application Rate, Timing, and Interrow Cultivation on Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Yield in Glufosinate-Resistant and Glyphosate-Resistant Corn

Brent E. Tharp; James J. Kells Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00042263

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a128a9c32fff68c83564191550c61e8b656442ae3525e6b1664f140c162a7c70 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.