Abstract
Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 at Belleville and Pawnee, IL, to evaluate single and sequential applications of glufosinate on tolerance of glufosinate-resistant corn and annual weed control. Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury 7 days after treatment (DAT) and 0 to 6% corn injury 28 DAT. Injury was characterized as stunting with glufosinate. Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield. At Pawnee in both years and at Belleville in 1996, a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%. At Belleville in 1997, sequential applications of glufosinate provided greater weed control (87 to 100%) than a single application (0 to 63%) because of weed emergence after application. Weed control with a single application of glufosinate or with nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil was similar at both locations. Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn (isoline of glufosinate-resistant corn).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury at 7 days.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Glufosinatee0
- Outcome
- corn injurye0
- Value
- 0 to 13%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury 7 days after treatment (DAT)”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate caused 0 to 6% corn injury at 28 days.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Glufosinatet0
- Outcome
- corn injurye0
- Value
- 0 to 6%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0 to 6% corn injury 28 DAT”
t0“Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate injury was stunting.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee0
- Outcome
- stuntinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Injury was characterized as stunting with glufosinate”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate did not reduce final corn height.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- final corn heighte0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate did not reduce grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
One application controlled giant foxtail 85 to 100%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
- Interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- controlled giant foxtaile0
- Value
- 85 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
One application controlled velvetleaf 85 to 100%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
- Interactor
- velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastie0weed - Outcome
- controlled giant foxtail, velvetleafe0
- Value
- 85 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
One application controlled ivyleaf morningglory 85 to 100%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
- Interactor
- ivyleaf morningglory
Ipomoea hederaceae0weed
- Outcome
- controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglorye0
- Value
- 85 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
One application controlled common lambsquarters 85 to 100%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
- Interactor
- common lambsquarters
Chenopodium albume0weed - Outcome
- controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarterse0
- Value
- 85 to 100%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential glufosinate gave greater weed control than one application.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- sequential applications of glufosinatee0
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 87 to 100%e0
- Qualifier
- 0 to 63%e0
- Comparator
- single applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sequential applications of glufosinate provided greater weed control (87 to 100%) than a single application (0 to 63%)”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
A single glufosinate application and nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil gave similar control.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- single application of glufosinatee0
- Outcome
- Weed controle0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- nicosulfuron plus bromoxynile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control with a single application of glufosinate or with nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil was similar at both locations”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant and susceptible corn did not differ in height.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- glufosinate-resistant corne0
- Outcome
- Heighte0
- Direction
- not differente0
- Comparator
- glufosinate-susceptible corne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant and susceptible corn did not differ in grain yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- glufosinate-resistant corne0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- not differente0
- Comparator
- glufosinate-susceptible corne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn”
The same questions in other papers
glufosinate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →glufosinate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
glufosinate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →glufosinate · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →glufosinate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →glufosinate · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.