Paper · 1999 · Weed Technology

Evaluation of Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) and Glufosinate: Efficacy on Annual Weeds

Ronald F. Krausz; George Kapusta; Joseph L. Matthews; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 at Belleville and Pawnee, IL, to evaluate single and sequential applications of glufosinate on tolerance of glufosinate-resistant corn and annual weed control. Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury 7 days after treatment (DAT) and 0 to 6% corn injury 28 DAT. Injury was characterized as stunting with glufosinate. Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield. At Pawnee in both years and at Belleville in 1996, a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%. At Belleville in 1997, sequential applications of glufosinate provided greater weed control (87 to 100%) than a single application (0 to 63%) because of weed emergence after application. Weed control with a single application of glufosinate or with nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil was similar at both locations. Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn (isoline of glufosinate-resistant corn).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury at 7 days.

Treatment
Glufosinatee0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Value
0 to 13%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate caused 0 to 13% corn injury 7 days after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate caused 0 to 6% corn injury at 28 days.

Treatment
Glufosinatet0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Value
0 to 6%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0 to 6% corn injury 28 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate injury was stunting.

Treatment
glufosinatee0
Outcome
stuntinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injury was characterized as stunting with glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate did not reduce final corn height.

Treatment
Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/hae0
Outcome
final corn heighte0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate did not reduce grain yield.

Treatment
Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate at 400 to 1,200 g ai/ha did not reduce final corn height or grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application controlled giant foxtail 85 to 100%.

Treatment
single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
Interactor
giant foxtaile0weed
Outcome
controlled giant foxtaile0
Value
85 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application controlled velvetleaf 85 to 100%.

Treatment
single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
controlled giant foxtail, velvetleafe0
Value
85 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application controlled ivyleaf morningglory 85 to 100%.

Treatment
single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
Interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome
controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglorye0
Value
85 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · InteractorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One application controlled common lambsquarters 85 to 100%.

Treatment
single application of glufosinate at 400 g/hae0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarterse0
Value
85 to 100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of glufosinate at 400 g/ha controlled giant foxtail, velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and common lambsquarters 85 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glufosinate gave greater weed control than one application.

Treatment
sequential applications of glufosinatee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
greatere0
Value
87 to 100%e0
Qualifier
0 to 63%e0
Comparator
single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential applications of glufosinate provided greater weed control (87 to 100%) than a single application (0 to 63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single glufosinate application and nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil gave similar control.

Treatment
single application of glufosinatee0
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nicosulfuron plus bromoxynile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control with a single application of glufosinate or with nicosulfuron plus bromoxynil was similar at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant and susceptible corn did not differ in height.

Material
glufosinate-resistant corne0
Outcome
Heighte0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
glufosinate-susceptible corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1065 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant and susceptible corn did not differ in grain yield.

Material
glufosinate-resistant corne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
glufosinate-susceptible corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Height and grain yield of glufosinate-resistant corn were not different from that of glufosinate-susceptible corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1065 · show in text ↑

glufosinate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

22 papers: 11 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

glufosinate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

glufosinate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

glufosinate · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

glufosinate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

glufosinate · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.