Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate early POST (EPOST) and late POST (LPOST) control of common ragweed and giant foxtail with mesotrione at 70, 105, and 140 g ai/ha alone and in mixtures with glufosinate at 300 g ai/ha in glufosinate-resistant corn. Glufosinate-resistant corn injury was frequently higher with mixtures of mesotrione plus glufosinate than with mesotrione applied alone. Mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied EPOST injured corn 6 to 21% in 1999, but in 2000, injury from mixtures was 23 to 30% from LPOST applications. Common ragweed control was above 77% with all treatments, which included 105 g/ha mesotrione. Giant foxtail control was higher at 76 to 78% by mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied LPOST than by mesotrione alone. Corn yields were highest when glufosinate was included in treatments at either application timing. In the greenhouse, mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate-injured glufosinate-resistant corn 11% or less, but corn biomass was reduced by 25% for the mixture of mesotrione at 105 g/ha plus glufosinate at 350 g/ha. Mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate can be more effective than mesotrione alone but control of common ragweed and giant foxtail might not be commercially acceptable.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Mesotrione plus glufosinate caused more corn injury than mesotrione alone.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn injury was frequently higher with mixtures of mesotrione plus glufosinate than with mesotrione applied alone.”
Claim · model-written summary
Early postemergence mixtures injured corn by 6 to 21% in 1999.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- Mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied EPOSTe0
- Outcome
- injured corne0
- Value
- 6 to 21%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied EPOST injured corn 6 to 21% in 1999”
Claim · model-written summary
Late postemergence mixtures caused 23 to 30% corn injury in 2000.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- mixturese0
- Outcome
- injurye0
- Value
- 23 to 30%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in 2000, injury from mixtures was 23 to 30% from LPOST applications”
t0“Mesotrione and Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments containing 105 g/ha mesotrione controlled common ragweed above 77%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- 105 g/ha mesotrionee0
- Interactor
- Common ragweed
Ambrosia artemisiifoliae0weed - Outcome
- Common ragweed controle0
- Value
- above 77%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Common ragweed control was above 77% with all treatments, which included 105 g/ha mesotrione.”
t0“Mesotrione and Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Late postemergence mixtures controlled giant foxtail at 76 to 78%, higher than mesotrione alone.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied LPOSTe0
- Interactor
- Giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- Giant foxtail controle0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 76 to 78%e0
- Comparator
- mesotrione alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Giant foxtail control was higher at 76 to 78% by mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate applied LPOST than by mesotrione alone.”
t0“Mesotrione and Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn yields were highest with glufosinate at either application time.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee0
- Outcome
- Corn yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn yields were highest when glufosinate was included in treatments at either application timing.”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse mixtures injured glufosinate-resistant corn by 11% or less.
Verbatim
e0“In the greenhouse, mixtures of mesotrione with glufosinate-injured glufosinate-resistant corn 11% or less”
Claim · model-written summary
In the greenhouse, 105 g/ha mesotrione plus 350 g/ha glufosinate reduced corn biomass by 25%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- mixture of mesotrione at 105 g/ha plus glufosinate at 350 g/hae0
- Outcome
- corn biomasse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 25%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn biomass was reduced by 25% for the mixture of mesotrione at 105 g/ha plus glufosinate at 350 g/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded that weed control with the mixtures might be commercially unacceptable.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Interactor
- common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
- Second interactor
- giant foxtaile0weed
- Outcome
- might not be commercially acceptablee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“control of common ragweed and giant foxtail might not be commercially acceptable”
t0“Mesotrione and Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn”
The same questions in other papers
mesotrione · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.