Abstract
Research was conducted in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate narrow row spacing and glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn. Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings at the same plant populations. Herbicide treatments included glufosinate alone and in different herbicide combinations. Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone. Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%. Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%. Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used. Row spacing had little effect on weed control. Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations.Nomenclature: Atrazine; glufosinate; browntop panicum Panicum fasciculatum Sw. #3 PANFA; entireleaf morningglory Ipomoea hederacea var. intergriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; johnsongrass Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHA; Palmer amaranth Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats. # AMAPA; smellmellon Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud. # CUMMD; common sunflower Heliathus annuus L. # HELAN; Texas panicum Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTE; toothed spurge Euphorbia dentata Michx. # EPHDE; corn (Zea mays L.).Additional index words: Narrow-row corn, transgenic corn, atrazine, pendimethalin, primisulfuron, CGA 152005 (proposed name, prosulfuron).Abbreviations: DAT, days after POST treatment; fb, followed by; LPOST, late postemergence; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone in glufosinate-resistant corn.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Atrazine plus glufosinatee1
- Interactor
- Palmer amaranthe1weed
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranth controle1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Comparator
- glufosinate alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory and entireleaf morningglory was greater than 82%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee1
- Interactor
- johnsongrass
Sorghum halepensee1weed - Second interactor
- ivyleaf morningglory
Ipomoea hederaceae1weed
- Outcome
- Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglorye1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 82%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate control of Texas panicum, smellmellon and browntop panicum was greater than 82%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee1
- Interactor
- Texas panicume1weed
- Second interactor
- smellmellone1weed
- Outcome
- Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicume1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 82%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate control of toothed spurge was greater than 82%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee1
- Interactor
- toothed spurge
Euphorbia dentatae1weed - Outcome
- toothed spurgee1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 82%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”
Claim · model-written summary
Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- glufosinatee1
- Interactor
- Common sunflower
Helianthus annuuse1weed - Outcome
- Common sunflower controle1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 95%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine followed by glufosinate provided at least 94% control of all weed species.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Atrazine followed by glufosinatee1
- Outcome
- control of all speciese1
- Direction
- at leaste1
- Value
- 94%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine followed by glufosinate was the most consistent herbicide system used.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Atrazine followed by glufosinatee1
- Outcome
- most consistent herbicide systeme1
- Direction
- most consistente1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing had little effect on weed control.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Row spacinge1
- Outcome
- weed controle1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”
e1“Row spacing had little effect on weed control”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinationse1
- Outcome
- Crop injurye1
- Direction
- minimale1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations”
The same questions in other papers
glufosinate · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
glufosinate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
atrazine · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →atrazine · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →glufosinate · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →density · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.