Paper · 2001 · Weed Technology

Glufosinate Combinations and Row Spacing for Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)1

CURTIS A. JONES; JAMES M. CHANDLER; JOHN E. MORRISON; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Research was conducted in 1997 and 1998 to evaluate narrow row spacing and glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn. Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings at the same plant populations. Herbicide treatments included glufosinate alone and in different herbicide combinations. Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone. Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%. Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%. Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used. Row spacing had little effect on weed control. Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations.Nomenclature: Atrazine; glufosinate; browntop panicum Panicum fasciculatum Sw. #3 PANFA; entireleaf morningglory Ipomoea hederacea var. intergriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; johnsongrass Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHA; Palmer amaranth Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats. # AMAPA; smellmellon Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud. # CUMMD; common sunflower Heliathus annuus L. # HELAN; Texas panicum Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTE; toothed spurge Euphorbia dentata Michx. # EPHDE; corn (Zea mays L.).Additional index words: Narrow-row corn, transgenic corn, atrazine, pendimethalin, primisulfuron, CGA 152005 (proposed name, prosulfuron).Abbreviations: DAT, days after POST treatment; fb, followed by; LPOST, late postemergence; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone in glufosinate-resistant corn.

Treatment
Atrazine plus glufosinatee1
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
glufosinate alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Atrazine plus glufosinate enhanced Palmer amaranth control compared to glufosinate alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory and entireleaf morningglory was greater than 82%.

Treatment
glufosinatee1
Interactor
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1weed
Second interactor
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae1weed
Outcome
Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglorye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
82%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · Second interactorUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate control of Texas panicum, smellmellon and browntop panicum was greater than 82%.

Treatment
glufosinatee1
Interactor
Texas panicume1weed
Second interactor
smellmellone1weed
Outcome
Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicume1
Direction
greatere1
Value
82%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate control of toothed spurge was greater than 82%.

Treatment
glufosinatee1
Interactor
toothed spurgeEuphorbia dentatae1weed
Outcome
toothed spurgee1
Direction
greatere1
Value
82%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Euphorbia dentata
Euphorbia dentata · InteractorFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control of johnsongrass, ivyleaf morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, Texas panicum, smellmellon, browntop panicum, and toothed spurge with glufosinate was greater than 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%.

Treatment
glufosinatee1
Interactor
Common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1weed
Outcome
Common sunflower controle1
Direction
greatere1
Value
95%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Common sunflower control with glufosinate was greater than 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by glufosinate provided at least 94% control of all weed species.

Treatment
Atrazine followed by glufosinatee1
Outcome
control of all speciese1
Direction
at leaste1
Value
94%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by glufosinate was the most consistent herbicide system used.

Treatment
Atrazine followed by glufosinatee1
Outcome
most consistent herbicide systeme1
Direction
most consistente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Atrazine followed by glufosinate applications provided at least 94% control of all species and was the most consistent herbicide system used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had little effect on weed control.

Treatment
Row spacinge1
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glufosinate-resistant corn was planted in 51- and 102-cm row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Row spacing had little effect on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations.

Treatment
glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinationse1
Outcome
Crop injurye1
Direction
minimale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Crop injury to glufosinate-resistant corn was minimal with glufosinate and atrazine plus glufosinate combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–940 · show in text ↑

glufosinate · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

glufosinate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

atrazine · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

atrazine · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 3 positive, 20 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

glufosinate · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

density · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.